Three questions:

Why did it take so long for national newspapers admit they are wrong? Why the Daily Mail will take more time than most to say sorry? Why does not the existence of the Leveson inquiry curb their arrogant behavior?

answers below, but first consider the facts. On 16 September last year - while sitting Leveson - the Sunday People published an article on the actor Roger Moore entitled "I've had more women than James Bond"

The newspaper quoted Moore as the use of these words and also it was very strange because he gave an interview to the newspaper.

history of the People was taken by the great Fleet Street jackdaw, the Daily Mail, and repeated almost word for word.

Needless to say Moore also talked with the mail and paper, obviously, has not verified the accuracy of the story.

Moore did not use the services of the Complaints Commission of the Press to complain to the press, preferring to follow by lawyers.

The advantage he could get damages. The disadvantage. This is a slower process than the CPC

So it was only on January 20, four months after the publication of the article in question that people wear servile apology in which he admitted that he "told" that Moore had spoken . "our reporter about his private life" He continued:

"We now accept that Sir Roger has not given an interview to our reporter and make observations that have been reported in the title.

We apologize for the distress and embarrassment our article caused Sir Roger Moore and have agreed to pay damages and costs. "

But e repeater, a false story, resisted until late last night before apologizing for the error:

"An article in the September 17 (" I was more in love than 007 ') includes comments attributed to Sir Roger Moore for a Sunday newspaper about his private life. This document has accepted the report does not accurately reflect a conversation with Sir Roger Moore and not to make informed comments. We apologize for the distress and embarrassment caused. "

Note the weasel words:. "No conversation accurately reflects" What conversation? People have accepted that Moore gave an interview to the journalist. Note also mention of damages and the payment of expenses.

If lawyers are involved - that announces the probability of having to pay the money - it is inevitable that the paper will seek to minimize the cost. Legal negotiations over pay and good excuses formulation takes time, even if the applicant is the explosion of paper rights.

Find best price for : --Google----Moore----Roger----Leveson----Mail--