fourth day of trial hears evidence from an engineer at Google, where email is considered as the central axis, while another staff member suggested including API design work

A Google engineer, testifying at a trial between high-risk enterprises against the software company Oracle search giant Google, denied that refers to Oracle or any other company when he wrote in an e- mail that Google should take a license to use the Java programming language.

another Google engineer who specializes in the Java programming language, said he had copied from the Java code in Android, and suggested that the software interfaces known as APIs are designed - that with Oracle trying to prove they can be owned, could be an important piece of evidence.

The trial entered its fourth day Thursday with Google engineer Tim Lindholm - author of an email whose eligibility key from both sides are competing fiercely in the pre-trial - to take support to respond questions. The focus was on an email written in 2010, which became an essential element of proof in this case.

Oracle has sued Google in August 2010, saying the system Google Android mobile operating violates their copyrights and patents for the Java programming language. Google responded that it violates patents Oracle Oracle and parts can not copyright of Java, an "open source", or the public, language of the software.

In opening statements, counsel for Oracle shows several emails from Google to the jury, calling them evidence that Google has taken its first intellectual property.

"As a software engineer, not a lawyer, who has always been my understanding of the organization of software APIs are free for use by others," he said.
Then Google said Christa Anderson's lawyer during interrogation that he understood the Oracle software on which you claim copyright except for use by others.