jurors whether they search giant violated copyright in parts of the Java programming language in the first two major questions
Jurors began deliberating on Mondaythe first of two major issues in the trial of Oracle-Google. If Google violates copyright Oracle in parts of the Java programming language
After two weeks of legal argument and review of large, including witnesses Executives of the company, Larry Ellison of Oracle and Google, Larry, counsel for both sides put their case to the jury.
Oracle is suing Google in U.S. federal court, alleging that the search giant's mobile platform Android violates its patents and copyrights in Java, and is seeking around $ 1 billion (£ 616m) in damages for copyright.
Two years ago, Oracle paid about $ 7.4 billion to buy Sun Microsystems, the acquisition of Java, the programming that is embedded in the Android smart phone technology to the inauguration.
In court Monday, Oracle attorney Michael Jacobs, said that parts of Java software that Google copied - the application programming interfaces that define the functions, have become very creative talent to compose. "It's like creating a symphony," Jacobs said during his speech.
Oracle also said that Google had copied 37 packets of 166 APIs used in Java -. "I think you can see because we talk a lot about" Google uses Java in Android is not covered by fair use a small piece for other purposes, Oracle said the lawyer.
"The fundamental question is:? Can anyone use the property of another company without your permission, and for them" He likened it to camp on the land of someone without asking - and added that blogposts written by the previous management of Sun on what could or could not do with Java is not legal advice rather than the number of licenses
- "Only after this trial is not brought here," said Van Nest. He cited the testimony of Jonathan Schwartz, formerly of Sun, who said he saw nothing wrong with what Google has done with Android.
- Google says Android - which is actually an implementation of Java, but with a different name - was designed in a "clean room" for people without the knowledge of the deepest Java function so as not to infringe the copyright of Sun Java.
said that the correct comparison of the API was 37 with 2.8 million lines of code in Java -. Unlike Jacobs API compared to 166
"API is not a book, not a game, not a song, not a poem," he said - only a functional component which allows developers to access source code
Find best price for : --Alsup----William----Jacobs----Michael----Oracle----Google----Java--
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(388)
-
▼
July
(18)
- Re-Inventing Public Libraries For The Digital Age
- Vaz urges tighter controls on violent games
- Guardian Activate New York 2012 - live
- SpaceX on Track for May 7 Launch
- Jury begins copyright deliberations
- Interview: Dragon's Dogma producer Hiroyuki Kobayashi
- Mini-lab promises affordable on-site DNA-based tes...
- Google v Oracle: a far-reaching trial
- Big Data age puts privacy in question as informati...
- Engineer says key email not about licence
- Internet: a web for the world | Editorial
- Ellison: we wanted to take on Android
- Google reports rise in government censorship
- This 'Marry You' video only feeds my existential c...
- Text mining: what do publishers have against this ...
- No phone signal? What bliss | Alex Clark
- Activision Shuts Down Prototype Dev Studio
- This is how Sony is marketing the White Vita in Ja...
-
▼
July
(18)
0 comments:
Post a Comment