C-11 Law Reform in Canada, we note that, when we were concerned about the "digital locks" which reflects the provision of DMCA anti-circumvention rules ridiculous, it was actually a lot of good law in other countries should take note. Not surprisingly, the entertainment industry feels different. Canada's negotiations with TPP assembly lobbyists in the entertainment industry see an opportunity to reverse all the good parts of the law of copyright in Canada. Michael Geist has the story of the IIPA - an organization formed by a group of organizations maximalist copyright other than the RIAA and MPAA - held a PPT presentation must overcome many parts of Canada the right to reasonable author again:

The IIPA, which recently presented its position on Canada's entry into the TPP under a U.S. regulatory process, especially because the role of ISP enforce copyright in Canada. Canadian "notice and notice" approach, which requires providers to supply thousands of complaints infringement notices to subscribers, a balance between efficiency and freedom of expression, protection of privacy users.



model has begun to attract the attention of the world with countries like Chile to adopt in its domestic law. IIPA strongly criticizes the approach, however, require dramatic reforms., it is argued Canadian law "does not encourage important for network service providers to cooperate with copyright owners to deal with copyright violations that occur in the environment digital network. "

place copyright lobby wants Canada to implement measures that require Internet providers to "take measures to prevent the repeat of the repeated use of their services committing a violation. demand copyright language "plain:. Completion system to cut Internet access to subscribers accused of rape

IIPA Canada also cancel changes statutory damages of Bill C-11 created a liability limit of $ 5,000 for non-commercial infringement. claims that the cover makes noncommercial statutory damages "ineffective in achieving its goals of full compensation and deterrence in the online environment."

Even with the change, Canada is one of the few developed countries tort that create the possibility of compensation for damage to several commercial counterfeiting million. non-commercial government created the cover because he was uncomfortable with the rules could prompt thousands of lawsuits against individuals.


This is not surprising, of course. These groups always And, really, this is a big part of the problem with all the secrecy surrounding the PPT. Although the process in Canada to approve C-11 certainly had its problems, at least in the bill was very public and open to discussion was important for long. And if you look at the previous attempts to reform copyright in Canada, the proposals have significant public scrutiny. None of this will happen TPP, which is still being negotiated in secret and not disclosed as a fact. take it or leave it And none of it will have the actual contribution of citizens who can speak to the edges of the negotiation, but they are never invited to comment on the proposals at all. Of course, the entertainment industry, as in many "advisory committees"
Find best price for : --copyright----Chile----Internet----IIPA--