Monday, April 16, 2012

The data provided in response to a statement from Oracle suggests that Google is becoming more recipes using ads and Android iPhone applications

Android

generates less than $ 550 million revenue from Google between 2008 and late 2011, if the figures provided by the search giant as part of a settlement offer before trial with Oracle violation patents and copyrights should be an accurate guide.

The figures also indicate that Apple devices like the iPhone, using products like their maps and Google search in Safari browser, has generated more than four times more revenue for Google in their own phones with the same period.

With nearly 200 Android devices were activated at the end of 2011, including an estimated 90m over the last two years suggests that Google gets a little more than $ 10 per year for the Android phone .

That compares with $ 38 billion in total revenues of Google in 2011, almost entirely from advertising on computers, which are installed around the world 1.25 billion, according to Microsoft. This suggests an average income of Google for about $ 30 per PC per year, but not everyone will be able to access the Internet or use Google, so the actual figure will be higher.

Google has never published the figures of revenue resulting from the use of Android phones, making the software available to handset manufacturers for free and get revenue from ads and sales requests. The company declined to comment on the calculations of the Guardian, which was shown prior to publication.

The figures come from the compensation offer Google made to Oracle as part of the settlement discussions ordered by Judge William Alsup in the case, in which Oracle is based on Android infringing patents and rights who owns the copyright in the Java programming language. Intellectual property acquired when it bought Sun Microsystems, the owner of Java, in 2010. The trial is scheduled for April 16.

The trial began in 2010 with Oracle claims that Android violates a series of patents from Sun and also violates the copyright in Java. The number of patents has been reduced to two.

In a settlement offer before trial, Google suggested that Oracle would pay a percentage of sales of Android, suggesting that it would pay $ 2.8 million in damages interest in the other two Oracle is seeking patents for the period 2011 and 0.5% of Android steady income in a patent that expires in December, and 0.015% in another, which expires in April 2018. The court documents (PDF) do not explain how income is calculated for Android, but the main source is advertising revenue. Google also reduced by 30% of sale applications for Android devices.

Google said the numbers correspond to what damage has been estimated by an expert appointed by the court. The offer does not mean that Google admits that he violated the patents claimed by Oracle.

The offer of $ 2.8 million, at a combined rate of 0.515%, suggests that the total income of Android since the launch of the first phones in late 2008 through 2011 was of $ 543m. Payments for patents for mobile phones are usually at a fixed price for all mobile phone license which is alleged to infringe the patents in question.

In turn, the comparison of total income of Android court documents indicate that the IOS has generated far more revenue for Google ecosystem of your own handset.

Oracle
Google rejected the offer, saying the proposed damages were too low.

The lawsuit was initiated after Oracle bought Sun Microsystems for $ 7.3 billion in 2010 and with it the rights of the Java programming language and patents. Oracle complained that Android in effect, a copy of the Java functions without a valid license.
Oracle, a software company with $ 36 billion in annual sales, said he is seeking hundreds of millions in damages - even though he was forced to soften his earlier claims, after the examination of custody has led to a number of patents applied in Java be invalidated.


Find best price for : --Microsystems----Touch----iPod----iPad----Java----Alsup----William----Android----iPhone----Google----Oracle--

0 comments: