Data

games are fun. But that does not mean that much of what a friend of his friends is a friend with knowledge of another friend

This week Facebook announced that it is an average of only 3.74 between friends Intermediate another user. Then he stepped back and waited for everyone to be duly surprised. Well, throw some numbers on the Facebook wall and see what sticks.

few months ago I was on Facebook looking for a pseudo-professional that I was to bother with the facts (which is one of my hobbies). When finally found, Facebook has kindly said that we had a mutual friend. It was not a real surprise for me for my foolish to use Facebook in recent years I have somehow accumulated 362 "friends". If everyone has a similar number of knowledge that could be more than 131 000 people within walking distance of me. Of course, the social web is more tangled - all my friends are only -. 362 friends, but even with coincidences, it's a lot of "friends of friends" out there waiting to be found

This concept of "degrees of separation" has been around since the early 20th century and many people have attempted to measure the actual number that is half on the relationship between two people on Earth. Historically This has involved the delivery of letters to random people and see how many "passages" necessary to achieve an individual goal. It was all a bit vague and the results far from robust.

So as much as I hate math in a parade, which is actually not very surprising. If everyone had only 100 friends say the report found, which means it has 10,000 friends of friends. If you include your 100 friends each, which is 1 million people in the three degrees of separation. Five degrees of separation that has 10 million people related to you, which is larger than the population of the Earth.

If you only have 100 friends each has been linked to everyone on Earth an average of 1.4 times each (so to speak), no wonder it's a small world after all. We wonder why I never thought was so great.

Find best price for : --Facebook--