It has become an axiom for the right wing British claim that renewable energy only works thanks to huge subsidies. Stick to fossil fuels, however, is the argument and maintain a source of economic power which supported our industry for centuries and should continue to do so for decades. Hence the recent decision by George Osborne gave up wind, tides and waves and plants to fill rather than invest in new power plants that run on gasoline. "We see gas as a power incessantly playing a fundamental part of our electricity generation to at least 2030," he argued.

• is a philosophy but a bad fat. For starters, this new momentum for gas is based on the idea that gas prices will remain at current levels or even modest cheaper for decades. The idea is fallacious. In fact, most economic forecasts indicate that the price of gas suppliers like Qatar in the coming years will increase global demand exceeds supply globally. Thus, the chancellor, in his desire to provide cheap energy in the short term, threatens to impede the nation for a very expensive source of energy in the long term. However, the unit offers a renewable energy independence on the theme of energy.

However, there is a more worrying issue in question. It follows reports that Osborne believes that support for green technologies and the need to maintain economic growth are fundamental opposites. This idea is not only wrong, but harmful. A market in renewable technologies grow around the world such as China, India and several other countries are trying to build low-carbon economies and look west to buy infrastructure. Britain is able to create the necessary industries that can provide the world with power and tidal technology and carbon storage. There is money in clean energy, in order, and the government needs urgently to accept this fact.