Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Surely it's obvious why arrested Sun journalists have not 'walked away'

7:38 AM | Posted by ProJ | | Edit Post

My story two days ago, Sun journalists were arrested between the hammer and the anvil, has attracted a lot of attention on Twitter (and I also received a few emails from those who prefer discreet discuss their private report).

'll ignore the insult that I was Neil Wallis' brain pudding. "You may have a point there. But it is not true that I have not asked the journalists cited Sun . why not just walk away.

Undoubtedly, the reason I have not been away was evident from their prices. They think they will lose their funding from international legal news and possibly their jobs.

"ready to admit that I may be mistaken in their belief. They can not know for sure if it would happen. But

fear

would. And certainly not the kind of situation where you could try and change your mind.

most importantly, I would like to draw the attention of all on the blog of Richard Moorhead, requesting funding is to jeopardize customer relations litigation lawyer?
  • Professor Moorhead, director of the Center for Ethics and Law, University College London, gives a lengthy review of my ad. Let me mention, without comment, only two paragraphs:
"An interesting question not answered in the story [Greenslade] is whether employees understand the negative consequences that may result from their silence if they run defenses that were not mentioned in the interviews.

Much depends, I suppose, to the extent that lawyers believe that their customers have substantial defenses and the extent to which the police have enough evidence to build a case against journalists. Both problems affect silence safely in an interview. "



Sources:

Lawyer Watch / Twitter


Find best price for : --Surely----Wallis----Neil--

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive